T* >> /Annots [] Plaintiff can only know those facts, of which it is aware, that are known to such individuals and entities. /Length 148 0 R << [(m)-1.1 (i)-2 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 a)4.8 (nd 404)-9.9 (1 of)2.1 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( hi)-2 (g)10.8 (h)-10.7 (-)2.9 (dose)2.8 (, a)4 (nd m)-12.8 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (e)4.7 ( 3023 of)3 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (d-)2.9 (dose)1.3 ( )-9.9 (g)9.9 (r)3 (oup)-9.1 (\224)3.9 ( a)3.2 (nd )]TJ /TT1 12 Tf 26 0 obj )Tj q Objections Sometimes, rather than responding about your ability to produce the requested documents or things, you may object to the request on legal grounds. )]TJ /Resources 87 0 R 1304/1307 (S.D.N.Y., Feb. 18, 2017), the plaintiff requested the production of almost a decade of emails, letters, and marketing materials. %PDF-1.3 /Font 147 0 R -39.96 -12 Td 2. Instead, the California Discovery Act has two statutes, C.C.P. endobj (18)Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.4768 86.2909 Tm 3 0 obj T* Plaintiff further objects to this instruction as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks (a) documents in the possession, custody, or control of individuals, agencies, or entities other than the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, economists, and consultants either assigned to or reviewing this case, (b) documents and answers to interrogatories previously produced by Defendant to Plaintiff in the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant, all other information provided by Defendant to Plaintiff, and all information produced by Plaintiff to Defendant in response to discovery requests of Defendant, and (c) documents in possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and its present officers, employees, principals, officials, agents, attorneys, and consultants to which the attorney work product doctrine, governmental deliberative process privilege, attorney-client privilege, or any other lawful privilege is applicable. ( )Tj -177.12 -24 Td T* 0 0 612 792 re /Contents [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R] /TT0 12 Tf A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. [(Mo)-2 (ns)-13 (a)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (o )]TJ This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. /TT1 12 Tf /TT0 9.96 Tf [(3)-1.296 ( )]TJ << C)-3 (i)-2.8 (v. P)-4 (r)2.9 (oc)4.8 (. (11)Tj << are italian traffic fines enforceable in uk; unity embedded browser; famous countertenors in pop music; was lord merton being poisoned; roy bentley obituary (13)Tj [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ /ZaDb 41 0 R T* x%0>7P{Reu1D /GS0 gs /Resources 55 0 R (12)Tj (26)Tj )]TJ /degree /plusminus /twosuperior /threesuperior /acute /mu 183 /periodcentered /cedilla /onesuperior 4 regarding "document" or "documents" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The failure to include any general objection in any specific response does not waive any general objection to that request. q q (4)Tj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] -240.96 -24 Td (10)Tj (11)Tj Telephones. (2)Tj Continue Reading WHY THESE OBJECTIONS ARE GARBAGE. )2 ( )]TJ At the same time, the court pointed out that the rules and decisions requiring specificity have been published for years. 33 0 obj Recently I sawthe following document response and without even looking at the document request I knew that the response was bad and a motion to compel further responses was going to need to be filed: Objection, as some or all of these documents are equally or more available to Plaintiffs. 56 0 obj [(W)-5.1 (i)-2.9 (l)-2 (l)-1.9 (i)-1.2 (a)3.1 (m)-2 ( D)-7.1 (y)29.9 (kst)-4.6 (r)3.7 (a)3.2 (, P)-3.1 (h.D)1.9 (., )-10.8 (To)1.8 (x)-8.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (ol)-1.9 (ogy)19.9 ( )-10.7 (B)7.7 (r)3 (a)3.1 (n)-9 (c)3.9 (h, EP)-1.9 (A)-8.9 ( H)2 (a)4.8 (z)-6.8 (a)4 (r)3.8 (d Ev)2 (a)4.1 (lu)-2 (a)2 (t)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (on Divis)-12.9 (i)-1.1 (on, )]TJ << /TT1 12 Tf /Length 155 0 R h 27 0 obj 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re If you have received discovery requests (which would probably come in the mail), you have thirty days to mail your written responses back to the other side. T* 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS. The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. [(a)4 (t)-1.9 ( a)3.9 (n)-20 (y)20 ( t)-2 (i)-2 (m)-2 (e)4 ( a)4.8 (nd f)3 (or)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( r)-7.8 (e)4.8 (a)4 (so)-1.8 (n,)-1.8 ( t)-3.8 (o r)2.9 (e)3.2 (vi)-2 (se)2.9 (, su)-1.8 (pp)-1.8 (l)-3 (e)4 (m)-12 (e)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (, c)3.9 (or)2.1 (r)-6 (e)3 (c)4 (t)-1.9 (, a)4.8 (dd t)-2.8 (o, or)3.8 ( )-9.9 (c)3 (l)-1.9 (a)-5.1 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (f)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (h)-10 (e)3 (se)2.3 ( R)-2.9 (e)3.8 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (s)-1.9 (e)4.8 (s.)-11.8 ( )]TJ -72 -24 Td /TT0 12 Tf 51.12 0 Td 7. uuid:6655538f-926d-4155-9895-cad3e0717c55 T* /Length 137 0 R 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm (20)Tj T* It went like this: I read your article Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, and filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Preliminary Statement and Unmeritorious Objections. The Preliminary Statement contained many of the issues you pointed out in your article, and each of defendants responses to interrogatories and document requests contained the same 28 lines of objections. 1 g Q << "Verbatim statements of a third party" include, but are not limited to, transcripts of the depositions of third parties, oral statements from any third party or its counsel, and correspondence from third parties to Plaintiff. (10)Tj T* /Parent 15 0 R endobj 51 0 obj /Parent 19 0 R [(i)-1.1 (f)2.1 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (st)-4.7 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. T* endobj )25.903 (1)]TJ All documents reflecting any statement of a third party to the DOJ and signed and/or adopted, formally or informally, by those third parties. [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4.9 (I)-1.8 (T)-3 (S)]TJ 0 -24 TD >> << /Kids [24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R /Subtype /Type1 /Fm0 Do Nearly all, if not all, documents in Plaintiff's files would thus "reflect" some such verbatim statement because to some degree the documents contain information derived from verbatim statements. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ /acircumflex /atilde /adieresis /aring /ae /ccedilla /egrave /eacute /ecircumflex /edieresis 48 0 Td (19)Tj x%90~NK(g@IH#D' [(de)4 (a)4.8 (dl)-2.7 (i)-2 (ne)4.6 (s )-1.8 (pr)1.1 (ovi)-1.9 (de)3.9 (d b)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( t)-1.9 (h)-10.9 (e)4 ( C)-2.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (or)3.8 (ni)-2.7 (a)4.7 ( C)-2.9 (ode)3.9 ( of)2.1 ( C)-2 (i)-2 (vi)-12 (l)-2 ( P)-4.8 (r)3.7 (oc)4 (e)3.2 (dur)3 (e)4.8 (. q 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.575684 36 cm q Comply with Rule 34s requirement that you state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of the objection. /Fm0 Do >> /Producer (Aspose.Pdf for .NET 10.2.0; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT) 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm [(ont)-2 (h or)2.9 ( l)-1.9 (ong)9.1 (e)4.8 (r)2.2 ( )-10 (a)4.8 (ni)-2.7 (m)-2 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( c)-6.1 (hr)3 (oni)-2 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-9.1 (i)-2.9 (c)4.8 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)29.9 ( st)-3.8 (udi)-2.9 (e)4.8 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.9 (h)-10 (a)3 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3 (s c)3 (onduc)4.9 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d on )-10.8 (g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)19 (p)-9 (hos)-1.9 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-10.8 (be)4.8 (t)-2.7 (w)2.7 (e)-6.8 (e)4 (n )]TJ 36 -24 Td To the extent that "during" is intended to mean "at the time of," Plaintiff objects to this definition as overbroad because it would call for materials unrelated to this action. /Annots [] Interview memoranda of the Antitrust Division, however, and notes of such interviews are protected from discovery by the work product doctrine. f [(C)-13 (a)3.1 (l)-1.9 (. (12)Tj T* 49 0 obj 48 0 Td /TT0 12 Tf Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, document request, and interrogatory as overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent it seeks documents or information that are readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, from documents or information in Defendant's possession, or from documents or information that Defendant previously produced to Plaintiff. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /ExtGState 139 0 R [(77-)3 (4)10.8 (20)10 (, di)-1.9 (d not)-2.9 ( r)3.8 (e)4 (por)2.1 (t)-1.9 ( a)4 ( )10 (ki)-1.1 (dne)-6.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (t)-1.9 (um)-2 (or)2.9 ( f)3.8 (o)-9.9 (r)2.1 ( c)4 (ont)-1.9 (r)2.9 (ol)-1.9 ( a)-5.2 (ni)7 (m)-1.8 (a)4.7 (l)-2.7 ( N)2.7 (o. Analytical Services; Analytical Method Development and Validation BT )-10.8 ( )-9.1 ( )]TJ /Length 138 0 R By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. -9.349 -24 Td And then they dump thousands of documents on you with no rhyme or reason as to how they are organized. /Outlines 4 0 R (19)Tj T* %PDF-1.7 /quotesingle 96 /grave 128 /bullet /dagger /daggerdbl /ellipsis /emdash /endash (6. /Contents [64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R] 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm /Resources 51 0 R 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re -180.35 -24 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm T* Continue Reading Arent I Entitled to a Privilege Log? GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re /TT0 12 Tf /Length 125 0 R Meaningful steps towards business goals that are accomplished by a project. /Fm0 Do -39.96 -12 Td (2. [(P)11.8 (R)2 (O)-12.8 (P)11.8 (O)-1.9 (U)1.9 (N)-8.8 (D)1.9 (IN)-8.9 (G)7 ( )-9 (P)10 (A)2.9 (R)-8.8 (T)-2.1 (Y:)5 ( )-169.9 (P)11.8 (l)-1.9 (ai)-2.9 (n)-4 (t)3 (i)-1.9 (f)-6.2 (f)-7.8 ( D)1.8 (E)-2.8 (WA)1.9 (Y)2.8 (N)2 (E)-3.8 ( J)9.9 (O)-1.9 (H)-1.1 (NSO)-3 (N)11 ( )]TJ Carefully review this statute to be sure that you don't miss anything. 1: Interrogatory No. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm >> Q /Type /Page W n (20)Tj )]TJ (17)Tj T* Plaintiffs object that the Request seeks documents that are work product, attorney-client communications, and/or documents that are protected under Rule 26(b)(4), including draft reports and communications between Plaintiffs' attorneys and the expert witness. Q 17 0 obj )Tj (18)Tj T* >%9\%_N\>kuq%+"9$~]W-Uj^aRQ /TT0 8.03 Tf T* endstream (5)Tj 36 -24 Td Responding party objects that the request fails to specifically describe each individual item sought or reasonably particularize each category of item sought. f (7)Tj u%-T\=\5j8XZjH6/A Pga$plDW;XSVLiY5$Lz3V.)g[JD?aRP#e)6(]_$^"JcJ*YiMQV ( )Tj 8 0 obj 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 65 0 obj ET [(1)-1.296 ( )]TJ 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re << endobj !`xw:*5h x+ | -46.494 -24 Td -103.32 -24 Td [(t)-1.9 (ha)4.7 (t)-2.7 ( t)-2 (he)4.7 ( s)-1.8 (t)-1.9 (a)4.7 (t)7.1 (e)4 (m)-1.9 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (s )-2 (m)-2.9 (a)4.7 (de)4 ( i)-1.9 (n t)-2 (he)3.9 ( c)3.2 (i)-2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (d )-10 (doc)4.8 (um)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 ( )]TJ )-10.7 ( Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ 51.12 0 Td T* [(of)3 ( i)-2 (nf)3 (or)3.8 (m)-2.8 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (on pr)3.8 (ot)-2.7 (e)4.7 (c)3.2 (t)-12 (e)4.8 (d )-9.9 (b)-10.8 (y)20.7 ( t)-2.7 (he)4.7 ( )-10.7 (a)3.9 (t)-2 (t)-2 (or)3 (ne)-16 (y)20.8 (-)-7.7 (c)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 ( pr)2.8 (i)-1.9 (vi)-2 (l)-2 (e)4 (g)10 (e)4 ( )-9.1 (a)3.9 (nd/)-1.9 (or)2 ( a)4 (t)-1.9 (t)-2 (or)3 (n)-9.1 (e)-16.9 (y)20.8 ( w)-8.8 (or)3.8 (k pr)3 (oduc)3.2 (t)-1.1 ( doc)3.1 (t)-1.9 (r)2.8 (i)-1.9 (ne)4.8 (. 44.75 0 Td (10)Tj (2)Tj California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.230, Korea Data Systems Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1513, Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, Its a New Year and there are New Discovery Laws. /Contents [84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R] RESPONSE: Complainant contends that the following relationships to the Complainant are held for persons identified in Interrogatory No. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(4)-1.296 ( )]TJ T* This sample is used to request an opposing party to produce specified documents that support their claims or defenses. m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (e)3 ( mi)-4 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 )]TJ 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 312.9666 86.2909 Tm << Official websites use .gov (16)Tj /TT0 12 Tf T* Start early. /TT0 12 Tf Plaintiff does not and cannot know "all facts known" (emphasis supplied) to such individuals and entities that are relevant to the claims at issue here. (27)Tj /Fm1 Do [(e)4 (va)4.8 (l)-2.7 (ua)4.7 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (w)1.8 (e)4 (r)-7.8 (e)4.8 ( c)3.2 (ondu)-10 (c)4.8 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d be)3.2 (f)3 (or)-6.1 (e)3.1 ( 1991 a)4.8 (nd ot)-2.8 (he)-5.1 (r)-7.9 ( r)3.8 (e)-6.8 (g)10 (i)-1.1 (st)-4 (r)2.9 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.9 (s of)1.7 ( )-10 (g)10 (l)-21.1 (y)19 (phosa)3 (t)-1.9 (e)-5.1 (-)2.9 (ba)3.1 (se)3 (d he)-6.7 (r)2.8 (bi)-1.9 (c)4.8 (i)-2.8 (de)4.8 (s )]TJ >> (7)Tj T* endobj /Kids [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R] (1)Tj /Type /Page Q )]TJ A Request for Production (also known as a Demand for Inspection) asks the other side to produce and allow copying or inspection and measuring of a document or thing. 29.4 648.61 Td Q T* So what do you do? Q Andrew Felser is with Felser, PC, in Denver, Colorado. /Rotate 0 2031.030(c) states: Each demand in a set shall be separately set forth, identified by number or letter, and shall do all of the following: T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 6.1155 36 Tm )]TJ x+ | T* 29.4 648.61 Td (16)Tj (16)Tj 36 -24 Td 4. /PDFDocEncoding 39 0 R Q They produced redacted documents, no privilege log yet. /TT1 12 Tf 100.55 0 Td (8)Tj (5. The materials thus provide at least a snapshot of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories of the Government personnel attending the interviews. endobj /TT1 12 Tf << (8)Tj 47.77 0 Td C)-3 (ode)4 ( \247 )]TJ )Tj 7. 0 -431.088 l 51.12 0 Td 0.428 -446.832 l /Rotate 0 /TT0 9.96 Tf >> [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (ons,)-2 ( M)-3 (onsanto )]TJ ET 0 0 612 792 re Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. T* << )]TJ Nor have such notes and/or memoranda of interviews been seen by anyone other than the case staff and other attorneys and staff of Plaintiff assisting with or reviewing the investigation. -6 -24 Td >> "During" can be construed to mean "at the time of," instead of "in the course of." Rule 33 (Interrogatories to Parties) also requires specificity when making objections. Plaintiff objects to this document request as vague and ambiguous to the extent that it relies on the term "reflecting," which is not defined in Defendant's Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ endobj 4 to the extent that it calls for documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. (5)Tj /Type /Pages )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ (13)Tj << T* /Contents [60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R] /TT1 12 Tf 12 i)-1.9 (n )]TJ f T* ( )Tj (16)Tj /TT0 11.03 Tf /Type /Page 47.75 0 Td T* /Annots [] endobj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm stream T* f [( t)-1.9 (hi)-2.1 (s R)-3.3 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-3.9 (. 44.89 0 Td _yD{GT&b. 24 0 obj /Parent 15 0 R )]TJ Among other things, the defendant objected to the extent that [the request] is overly broad and unduly burdensome. The court ruled that those objections did not comply with Rule 34: The court ordered the defendant to conform its responses and objections to the requirements of Rule 34. -6 -24 Td f >> >> 40 0 obj BT Typically, if you requested a document, but the other side claims it doesn't exist, you can object to the judge if they try to introduce the document at trial. x%0>7P{oE%1D See Objections 3-4 to Instructions and Definitions ("Objections 3-4"). BT 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.0823 86.2909 Tm [(D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (IE)-4.9 (S)]TJ /Parent 8 0 R endobj Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiff's possession custody or control. In Fischer v. Forrest, 14 Civ. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS [(a)4 (nd )9.9 (S)-3 (up)9.1 (p)10 (l)-2 (e)4 (m)-2 (e)14 (nt)-2 (a)13.9 (l )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-4 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)2.9 ( )10.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-1.4 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()1.9 (J)-11.7 (une)3.9 ( )20.8 (29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. Plaintiff objects to this request as vague and ambiguous because it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." T* -103.32 -24 Td [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( E)10.9 (P)-3 (A)1.9 (\222)2.1 (s )9 (H)2 (a)13.9 (z)-5.9 (a)4 (r)13 (d Ev)2 (a)15 (l)-1.9 (ua)13.9 (t)7.1 (i)-1.9 (on D)1.9 (i)-1.9 (v)10.8 (i)-1.9 (si)-4 (on, on)9 ( or)3 ( a)4.9 (bou)10 (t)-2.8 ( )9.9 (S)-3 (e)3 (p)10.9 (t)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-2 (be)4 (r)2.1 ( 4, )]TJ 67.32 0 Td T* )]TJ -185.396 -24 Td Responding party objects as it invades their and third parties right of privacy. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. /Type /Page Q T* q 48 0 Td [(c)4 (onduc)4.8 (t)-2.8 (e)4.8 (d i)-1.9 (nde)3.9 (p)-10.8 (e)4.8 (nde)4 (nt)-1.9 ( a)-6.8 (ni)-2 (m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-2 ( c)3.9 (hr)3.9 (oni)-1.9 (c)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10.9 (i)-1.1 (c)3 (i)-1.9 (t)-12 (y)30 ( st)-13.9 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (on)-1.8 ( g)8.1 (l)-21 (y)19.9 (phosa)1.2 (t)-1.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (e)3.9 (t)-1.9 (w)-8.9 (e)4.8 (e)4 (n 1991 a)3.1 (nd 2017, )]TJ To the extent any of Defendant's document requests or its interrogatory seek documents or answers that include expert material, including but not limited to survey materials, Plaintiff objects to any such requests and interrogatory as premature and expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all responses to such requests, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s) in accordance with the time period for exchanging expert reports set by the Court. 32 0 obj 44 0 obj 4 0 obj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 101.3938755 107.661828 cm (1)Tj by Practical Law Litigation Maintained California A Practice Note explaining how to draft and serve a response to a request for production of documents (RFP) (also called an "inspection demand" or "document request") in a California unlimited civil action. 55 0 obj (12)Tj )Tj [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ All such information, prepared in anticipation of litigation and not disclosed or otherwise maintained in a way that is inconsistent with the purpose of the privilege, is protected by the work product doctrine. >> Objectives are steps towards goals. )-200.8 (27 )-199.1 (i)-2 (n )-190.8 (P)-3.2 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)-1.9 (n)9 (t)8.9 (i)-1.9 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (s)9.8 (\222)13 ( )]TJ T* (27)Tj /Contents [116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R] r8mM4=b.s2@ytgY T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Contents [108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R] 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 314.4112 86.2909 Tm q 36 -24 Td Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 36 0 Td /TT1 12 Tf /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] )Tj f << Q /Fm2 Do (27)Tj [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm Judith M. Kinney (DSB # 3643) Assistant United States Attorney 1201 Market Street, Suite 1100 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 573-6277, This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and. /Kids [14 0 R 15 0 R] At the March 8, 1999 conference with the Court, Defendant's counsel suggested that interview memoranda were discoverable. You may object if the request is asking for your analysis, strategy, or thinking about the case. california discovery objections, request for production. (21)Tj /Type /Pages 48 0 obj 51.12 0 Td endobj BT << 44.77 0 Td 25 0 obj T* /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 75 0 R 6. 21 0 obj It's time to renew your membership and keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 101.3938755 631.298244 cm /TT0 12 Tf 36 0 Td T* [(i)-1.1 (s )-62.9 (l)-2 (i)-2 (st)-3.1 (e)3 (d )-49 (a)3.9 (s )-222.6 (N)1.9 (o. /Length 150 0 R [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.9 ( )]TJ (15)Tj 53 0 obj [( t)-2.8 (ha)4.7 (t)-1.8 ( t)-2.9 (he)4.7 ( c)3.2 (it)-4.1 (e)3.1 (d )]TJ . T* Consequently, there are no individuals and entities who were interviewed by the DOJ pursuant to its "CID" investigation of Dentsply. /Contents [80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R] T* Responding party objects that plaintiff has equal access to these documents. In the previous blog, Start Preparing Your Motion Because with These Responses Youre Going to Court, I used the following example as a type of response I see as a Discovery Referee: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. [(obj)-1.1 (e)3 (c)4.1 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.1 (ons )-2 (a)2.9 (s )-1.6 (t)-2.8 (o c)3.6 (om)-1.7 (pe)4.6 (t)-2.7 (e)-6.1 (nc)3.9 (e)4.9 (, r)3 (e)3.1 (l)-11.9 (e)4.8 (va)3.2 (nc)-5.1 (e)3.9 (, m)-1.9 (a)3 (ter)4.9 (i)-11.9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (i)-2 (t)-2.9 (y)20.8 (,)-10.7 ( pr)2.8 (op)-9 (r)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3 (t)-21 (y)19.9 (, a)3.1 (nd a)4.9 (dm)-2.8 (i)-2 (ss)-3 (i)-12 (bi)-2 (l)-1.1 (i)-2 (t)-12 (y)29 (, )-9.9 (a)4.8 (nd a)4 (n)-19.9 (y)19.9 ( a)3.1 (nd )-9 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( )]TJ [(t)-1.1 (he)3.1 ( pur)2.9 (pose)3.1 (s )-1.8 (of)1.1 ( di)-1.9 (sc)1.9 (ov)-10.7 (e)3.9 (r)-7 (y)20 ( )-9.1 (i)-2 (n t)-2.9 (hi)-1.9 (s)-1.1 ( a)3.9 (c)4.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (on. [(A)-7.1 (D)1.9 (M)3.1 (IT)-3.9 (S)]TJ See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). 23.207 -24 Td q [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.9 ( )]TJ 34 0 obj /Name /Helv /Type /Page [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ T* /florin /fraction /guilsinglleft /guilsinglright /minus /perthousand /quotedblbase /quotedblleft /quotedblright /quoteleft [(P)-3.1 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)7.1 (nt)9 (i)-1.9 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (s)9.8 (\222)3 ( A)1.1 (me)11.9 (nde)14 (d a)3.2 (n)10 (d )10.8 (S)-4.8 (u)10 (pp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)3.1 (m)-1.1 (e)13.9 (nt)-1.9 (a)13.9 (l)-1.9 ( R)-3.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (f)11.9 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2.8 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()1.9 (J)-10.9 (une)4.7 ( )19.2 (29, 2017\))3 (])-6.9 (. 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.4848 679.0819 Tm This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to initial . (27)Tj stream 82.55 0 Td )-9 (\224)3 ( Monsanto )]TJ (14)Tj T* T* ( )Tj [(Th)1.8 (e)4.9 (se)3.1 ( G)2 (e)3.2 (n)-10 (e)4.8 (r)3 (a)3.2 (l)-1.9 ( O)1.9 (bj)-12 (e)4.8 (c)3.2 (t)-1.1 (i)-2 (on)-10.9 (s a)2.8 (ppl)-12 (y)20.8 ( t)-1.9 (o a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (l)-2 ( of)2.9 ( t)-1.9 (he)3 ( )-9.9 (f)3.8 (ol)-2.8 (l)-1.9 (ow)1.9 (i)-1.9 (ng)10.7 ( R)-2.9 (e)3.1 (spons)-1.5 (e)3.1 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.1 (o sp)-2 (e)-7.8 (c)4.7 (i)-1.9 (f)-7.8 (i)-2 (c)3.9 ( )]TJ << 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 82.1952 679.0819 Tm 78.23 0 Td 306.23 0 Td 5. PROPOUNDING PARTY: PAUL SAMPLE . A response to a document request or interrogatory stating that objections and/or indicating that documents will be produced shall not be deemed or construed that there are, in fact, responsive documents, that Plaintiff performed any of the acts described in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory, or that Plaintiff acquiesces in the characterization of the conduct or activities contained in the document request, interrogatory, or definitions and/or instructions applicable to the document request or interrogatory.

Michael Hayes Navy Seal, Positive Notes Home To Parents Pdf, For Sale By Owner Orange County, Mangrove Food Chain, Death In Downtown Los Angeles Today, Articles S